Both BlueHost and FatCow are not stranger to most web hosting shoppers. Both companies started business in the late 90s, both focus in shared hosting services, and both are highly rated among webmasters. It’s easy to see why people tend to compare BlueHost and FatCow. In this article, we are going to dig deep and find out who has the best between FatCow and BlueHost hosting.

(Alternatively, you might want to see them reviewed separately in my hosting reviews: FatCow Review; BlueHost Review.)

Compare FatCow and BlueHost Hosting Plans

To get things started, let’s have a quick check on FatCow and BlueHost hosting features.

Web Hosting Features	FatCow	BlueHost
Disk Storage	Unlimited	Unlimited
Bandwidth	Unlimited	Unlimited
Free Domain	Unlimited	Unlimited
Addon Domain	Unlimited	Unlimited
MySQL Database	Unlimited	100
Email Accounts	Unlimited	2,500
Forwarders
Auto Responders
Web-Based Email
Control Panel	vDeck	cPanel
Auto Script Installater	In-House	SimpleScripts & Fantastico
Agora Shopping Cart	-
osCommerce	-
ShopSite		-
PowerPay		-
PayPal Integration		-

As you can see the major differences between the two are the quantity of mySQL databases and the control panel software. From what I know, BlueHost runs a tight restriction on the amount of MySQL databases you can add into your account. While they are offering unlimited disk storage and hosting bandwidth, they limit your database capacity at 100.

While most webmasters prefer cPanel (because of familiarity I guess), I don’t see any big dissimilarity between cPanel and vDeck. Hence, I wouldn’t suggest you to use this as a deciding factor for your purchase.

Pricing: FatCow vs BlueHost

BlueHost cost $83.4 to $95.4 annually (depends on your subscription period); while FatCow, after special discount offer at W.H.S.R., cost $57.96 per year (35% discount from the original $7.5/mo).

Popularity: FatCow vs BlueHost

Web Search Interest

From Google Insights (in hosting related categories), BlueHost clearly outranked FatCow in term popularity, with a score of 63 – in contrast of FatCow’s score of 12.

Regional Interest

BlueHost searches come from all around the world; while FatCow hosting is interested mainly by the west.

Customer Supports: FatCow vs BlueHost

Both BlueHost and FatCow customers are supported 24/7 via phone, live chat, and email ticketing system.

BlueHost live chat system is powered by AliveChat; while FatCow system is supported by LivePerson. I have personally tested both live chat systems several times and I found both are doing okay. Not that they are doing extraordinary well; but it’s totally acceptable for web hosts in this price range.

Additionally, BlueHost host a user-support forum. BlueHost users can share and solve their problems via message board discussions.

Green Energy Hosting: FatCow vs BlueHost

Electricity consumption (servers and offices) at FatCow is fully offset by wind-generated Renewable Energy Certificates (REC) from Community Energy Inc (CEI) – this makes FatCow hosting 100% green.

On the other hand, there is no news of BlueHost going green so far.

My conclusion: FatCow or BlueHost?

What I think about Bluehost and FatCow hosting?

I spent years with BlueHost as customer and have been using FatCow for more than a year now. In overall, I am happy with both at the moment.

It’s worth noting that I had some really bad time with BlueHost hosting back in January/Febuary 2009 where the server is heavily loaded (sign of unmanaged overselling!) and my database server is on and off broken. Nevertheless, the problem is solved by now.

FatCow hosting, on the other hand, is doing superbly well in my record. Fast and reliable server, responsive customer supports, and peace-of-mind daily backup service – all in just $4.83/mo. This is why I rated them as my top hosting service along with Hostgator.

So who should you go with – FatCow or BlueHost?

At this point of writing, I’m strongly convinced that FatCow is the better choice. Not to say that BlueHost is bad; but the pricing is a huge aspect that separate the two and FatCow is a lot cheaper. Unless you are biased towards BlueHost’s cPanel; else I don’t see why you should choose them over FatCow.

Visit FatCow and BlueHost online

FatCow Official Site: http://www.fatcow.com BlueHost Official Site: http://www.bluehost.com.

Introduction

Both Hostgator and Lunarpages are not new names in the hosting industry. Hostgator, founded by Brent Oxley in year 2002, currently based in Houston, Texas. The Gator is currently hosting more than 2,200,000 websites and they were recognized by Inc. Magazine as one of the fastest growing private companies in America.

Lunarpages, on the other hand, first started in web hosting business as part of Add2Net Inc. in year 1998; the name “Lunarpages” is introduced in year 2000. At this time of writing, Lunarpages is managed by Ron Riddle and the company operates in One Wilshire and Las Vegas.

Both Lunarpages and Hostgator run their own data centers and offer a wide range of different hosting services – including shared, dedicated, and reseller hosting. This makes comparing the two reasonable as they often appear in the same shopping list.

In this article, we are going to dig deep and compare both hosting companies in term of general popularity, hosting features, as well as customer supports. Alternatively, you can check out Lunarpages and Hostgator separately in my hosting reviews.

Hostgator vs Lunarpages in term of popularity

From Google Insights, the graph clearly indicates that Hostgator is much favored than Lunarpages. More over, Hostgator is showing a strong growth trend in term of popularity where more and more Internet users are searching on Hostgator; while Lunarpages stays more or less the same in term of general popularity.

Regional Interest on Hostgator and Lunarpages

Hostgator gets more attention from the Asia countries where Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, and India appear as the top five countries with the most searches on Hostgator; while for Lunarpages, United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Canada are the top five countries in the regional interest list.

Compare Hostgator and Lunarpages hosting plans

Based on 12 months subscription period, below are the comparison of Hostgator and Lunarpages hosting plans.

Shared Hosting Plan

Dedicated Hosting Plan

Hostgator is better and cheaper!

From the tables, we can see clearly that Hostgator outranked Lunarpages in term of features and prices. Hostgator shared hosting plan is slightly more expensive than Lunarapges however the Gator users get free $25 Google Adwords credit, longer trial period, private SSL features, and around-the-clock customer supports.

On dedicated hosting plans, Hostgator’s Standard package provides better features and lower price when compare to Lunarpages top dedicated hosting plan (package name Dedi III). With Hostgator, you get 10 dedicated IP address (in contrast, 2 with Lunarpages), free Fantastico supports, 24/7 supports, server monitoring (in contrast, Lunarpages charge extra $9.99/mo for server monitoring), and best of all – with all these advantages over Lunarpages, the Gator is still charging less on their customer ($219/mo).

Hostgator vs Lunarpages in term of customer supports

There is a H-U-G-E different between Lunarpages and Hostgator when it comes to customer supports.

Lunarpages simply failed to live up to the industry standards on after-sales support – the web host does not provide 24/7 live chat or telephone technical support! On the other hand, Hostgator hosting comes with 24/7 technical support via live chat, telephone, and forum. More over, Hostgator support is done by inhouse staffs, who are more knowledgeable (to the company operations) and responsive.

My conclusion on Hostgator vs Lunarpages

My user experience with Hostgator and Lunarpages

I spent years hosting websites on both Hostgator and Lunarpages. In overall I’m happy with both of their services – especially in term of server reliability. Both web hosts deliver respectable server uptime and fast hosting services. I need little help from the support department thus the lack of 24/7 live chat support in Lunarpages wasn’t bothering me much. Anyhow, it’s worth pointing out that it takes days for Lunarpages to response on my request; while for Hostgator it’s just matter of minutes.

However, I was pretty disappointed with Lunarpages recently as they changed their pricing structures without informing us (as customers) properly. While you might think Lunarpages seems like a good budget hosting choice, the reality is far away from that. The Lunarpages widely-promoted $4.95/mo hosting deal is only available if you are willing to take up the 60 months hosting plan (which is absolutely ridiculous!).

Who should you go with – Hostgator or Lunarpages?

Short answer, Hostgator. You’ll get better hosting features and customer supports in similar or lower price (depends on your hosting plan).

Visit Hostgator online: http://www.hostgator.com
Visit Lunarpages online: http://www.lunarpages.com

We often hear people complaining web hosting (insert hostname here) sucks but the statement is never backed by quantitative facts and numbers.

Not now anymore.

For all the geeks that can’t resist pouring numbers to every aspect of life, here’s an interesting way to check does your web hosting suck or not:

1. Open an Excel sheet for data processing.
2. Google ‘X-hosting rocks’ and record down the number of results returned, say figure ‘A’.
3. Google ‘X-hosting sucks’ and record down the number of results returned, say figure ‘B’.
4. Divide figure ‘B’ (the number of X-hosting sucks) by the sum of figure A and B.
5. The answer of the equation in (4) is the “Suckage Ratio”- the lower the number, the better the hosting company you’re reviewing.

Example: Calculating the suckage ratio for Bluehost

Take Bluehost for example, when search for the term ‘Bluehost Rocks‘, we get result of 122,000; when search for ‘Bluehost sucks‘, we get 23,200 results. The suckage ratio, thus is equal to 23,200/(23,200 + 122,000) = 0.066 = 6.6%.

The number itself does not convey any meaningful information. However when compare with bunch of other web hosting suckage ratio – it tends to work as a benchmark system to decide whether Bluehost is worth trying or not.

Make sense, huh? This interesting rating method is introduced by Hosting That Sucks where web hosts are rated mainly based on the suckage ratio.

The rating methodology is a good (and creative) way of numerical based analysis, which sometimes is better than review based on personal likes and dislikes.

Modified Web Hosting Suckage Ratio

But you see, the Suckage Ratio can be improved if we implement a little searching trick with Google. What Nor (owner of Hosting That Sucks) used was the search results of ‘X-hosting sucks’ and ‘X-hosting rocks’ where the search term itself can be misleading. A document with just the word ‘sucks’ or ‘X-hosting’ (any host name) might appears in Google’s search result page, which in turn skew the accuracy of our calculation outcome. The twist, is to search with the quotes (“” – something like this) and to divide the number with the popularity of the host name (result returned when we search with the hostname).

The twisted suckage ratio calculation, therefore, is:

The number of Google results in ‘ quoted X-hosting sucks’ divide by the number of Google results in ‘X-hosting’.

Confused? Don’t be. The concept is pretty simple when example is given. Let’s take my other favorite for example – Hostgator. Google “Hostgator Sucks” (with quotes) return 1,650 results; ‘Hostgator’ (without quotes) on the other hand return 2,510,000 results. Thus the twisted suckage ratio = 1,650/2,510,000 x 100% = 0.07%.

Web Hosting Recommendation based on Suckage Ratio

To make this post meaningful, I had calculated Suckage Ratio for some of the major hosting and here are my results. (The lower the suckage ratio the better.)

To my surprise, it’s Dot5 Hosting that comes up top in the result (I was expecting Hostgator instead). Dot5 is the hosting with least results in ‘Hostname sucks’, in other words – sucks the least.

Is Suckage Ratio reliable?

Well as said, suckage ratio is just a good numerical way to rate and compare web hosting services. As the formula is rather over-simplified and the input numbers are based on Google’s search index, the rating is nothing better than just a references.

Personally I think it’s just some-what-accountable and wouldn’t take the numbers for too serious.

But then again, it’s fun calculating and seeing the results don’t you think? People always say this and that sucks but they have no hard numbers to support their statement. Well not with web hosting now, you can act nerd say “PowWeb Sucks” and it has a 0.09% suckage score!

So does your web hosting service suck? I’m more than happy to read your input.

(Side note: Dot5 Hosting is chosen as the Best Budget Hosting 2008. Or to learn more about Dot5, click here to visit Dot5 official website.)

Bluehost is a well known name in web hosting industry with a good number of satisfied customers and quality services.

Lately the hosting company was reviewed in comparison with Lunarpages (Read Bluehost vs Lunarpages) here.

This article will discuss the differentiating features of Bluehost and iPower hosting, in order to make it easier for user to decide which hosting he should continue with.

Who’s better: Bluehost hosting or iPower?

iPower is a little less popular that that of Bluehost, but has enough users. Why Bluehost is ahead in the competition? Here’s the short analysis.

• Bluehost seems a little expensive as compared to iPower, but exploring the features you’ll find it more cost effective as it allows more resources while resources like disk space, bandwidth, MySQL databases etc are very limited at iPower hosting.
• Bluehost offers secure servers for E Commerce and shopping sites, while the features’ list at iPower hosting doesn’t clearly mention anything in this regard on site, so, its better if support is contacted.
• Bluehost will be the best choice for multimedia sites, i.e. flash, shockwave, audio and video streaming etc, while iPower may not be a suitable option for this.
• Fantasico, Simple Scripts, and Cpanel together make an easy way for non technical business individuals to setup scripts and manage site in an effective manner at Bluehost.

Compare Bluehost and iPower hosting features

Web Host	Disk Storage	Bandwidth	MySQL	Free domain	Price/mo
BlueHost	Unlimited	Unlimited	100	Yes	$6.95
iPower	1,500 GB	15,000 GB	25	Yes	$7.95

: Recommended.

Conclusion: So is Bluehost the better choice?

If you’ve a small or medium scale business, Bluehost will be a good choice without any hesitation, but make sure by having a detailed analysis of features that this is what all you need. In case if your requirements are less than that if offers, try a short period plan of iPower hosting and decide yourself.

The answer? Bluehost (based on Google Insights ).

The result is not that big surprise as I already learned that Bluehost’s hosting the most domains among the three. The company (Bluehost) is in fact knocking on the door of 1,000,000 domain on early April.

However, not everything’s as I expected.

Surprise 1: Lunarpages is falling pretty behind

I am very surprise to see that Lunarpages were not much searched outside United States. Lunarpages’s hosting plan is the cheapest when compare to the other two; but they are the less popular.

All three hosting services are as good with excellent server uptime and loadspeed, top notch customer supports, and features-rich hosting plan. But why Lunarpages is losing so much ground in the International market? I couldn’t come up with any reason except that Hostgator and Bluehost are doing a better job in branding.

Anyhow, I expect they will be catching up fast as I see some good marketing moves around Lunarpages such like the recent fall promotions (unlimited bandwidth/storage at $4.95/mo) and WP themes designs .

Surprise 2: Asia countries are taking over the top spots

We can see that English is still the dominant language around the Internet, but the country searching for hosting services are shifting fast from the west to east.

A quick view on the top 10 country list, you’ll see how welcomed is Hostgator and Bluehost in the Asia countries.

Singapore, with a population of 4 millions plus, actually contribute more searches on Bluehost/Hostgator than in United States!

The other Asia countries in the top 10 list are Taiwan, China, Malaysia, India, and Hong Kong. That’s 6 out of the top 10.

Ireland, New Zeland, and Canada are the other three in the list.

Hostgator, Bluehost, or Lunarpages?

So who’s the best web hosting?

The popularity check shows nothing but the business’s global reach of the hosting companies. Being popular doesn’t mean that being the best; being unpopular doesn’t mean that the service is lousy either.

My recommendation remains the same where I think Bluehost and Lunarpages are the best for budget/multiple domain hosting; while Hostgator remains top in reseller hosting service provider.

Oh by the way, Lunarpages is the only that’s offering special promotion right now. Get unlimited addon domain, unlimited bandwidth, unlimited disk storage with just $4.95/mo! Can’t believe this is true? Then why not have a look at their website yourself.

Visit Lunarpages online!

In the past we’d compared Apollo and Hostmonster’s hosting services. Keeping the review trend alive, this article will compare Hostmonster with Pow Web Hosting.

Hostmonster is in market since 1996, while the later mentioned is since 1999, so there may be a little difference in userbase, but the important factor for us to discuss is the qualitative aspect of the services of both.

So here it goes.

Hostmonster is a fairly good player in the market in comparison with Pow Web hosting, and it’s because of the quality and good standards of services they provide. It doesn’t mean that Pow Web doesn’t have market, it does have a good share, but less than that of Hostmonster.

Hostmonster and Pow Web – who’s the better host?

Let’s add some pros and cons to the discussion to verify this.

• Hostmonster’s in house support makes it different at first here as well.
• Pow Web is less costly in comparison with Hostmonster, but to avail that rate you must subscribe for one year at least. And if you don’t subscribe for a longer period, the rate will go higher than that of Hostmonster.
• At Hostmonster you can unsubscribe at anytime, while you’re bound for a longer period at Pow Web.
• Hostmonster offers Secured SSL servers for E Commerce hosting, while on Pow Web it’ll be shared secured.
• Hostmonster provides script library containing a variety of free open source scripts, while this variety is not available at Pow Web, though it has some most popular scripts.
• Hostmonster is a best choice if you’re to host a site with multimedia content, i.e. Flash, Shockwave, video streaming etc.

Hosting features comparison

Hostmonster

Pricing	Details
24 months plan (Prepaid)	$6.95/mo
Disk Space	Unlimited
Monthly Bandwidth	Unlimited
Free Domain Name	Yes, forever!
Host additional Domains	Unlimited
Parked Domains	Unlimited
Subdomains	Unlimited
mySQL Databases	100
Visit Hostmonster online, click here!

Pow Web

Pricing	Details
24 months plan (Prepaid)	$5.77/mo
Disk Space	Unlimited
Monthly Bandwidth	Unlimited
Free Domain Name	Yes
Host additional Domains	Unlimited
Parked Domains	Unlimited
Subdomains	Unlimited
mySQL Databases	Unlimited
Visit Pow Web online, click here!

Wrapping things up

Hostmonster will definitely suit you best, but if cost is the concern, you can try out Pow Web’s short term plan, and see if it works for you.

And if you find it good in three months then subscribe for a long term plan.

Why Hostgator is a webhosting leader?

It’s not a new question and we’ve already answered this here (Hostgator vs Dot5) and here (Hostgator vs WebHostingPad) .

But web hosting is a very competitive industry, and potential companies keep on coming, they grow and become big names as well. The web hosting companies, we’ve compared Hostgator earlier are also good names and have potential to acquire more of the market share.

Who’s the better web host: Apollo or Hostgator hosting?

This article is another comparison of Hostgator series, and will compare the services of Apollo with Hostgator. Apollo is also one of the potential web hosting leaders with more than 165, 000 domains hosted with it.

Both are good names, but Hostgator still has the hold on industry with some distinguishing features that include:

• Apollo hosting offers only 50GB/500GB disk storage/bandwidth; while Hostgator offers 600GB/6,000GB disk storage/bandwidth – that’s 10 times different!
• Monthly payments options of Hostgator, letting you discontinue at anytime you’re unsatisfied makes is much convenient to decide by testing it. On the other hand, Apollo requires a long term subscription.
• Prices at Apollo Hosting get higher if it’s a short term subscription, so the less price advantage may be overshadowed here.
• Hostgator provide +52 ready made scripts, while the other one has a limited choice.
• Hostgator offers money back guarantee, so if services are not as promised, you can have your money back.
• Hostgator was rated A (recommended) in our expert review session; while Apollo Hosting was rated C (Not recommended). Hostgator detail review, click here ; Apollo detail review, click here .

Hosting features comparison

Apollo Hosting

Pricing	Details
24 months plan (Prepaid)	$6.95/mo
Disk Space	50GB
Monthly Bandwidth	500GB
Free Domain Name	No
Host additional Domains	20
Parked Domains	-
Subdomains	Unlimited
mySQL Databases	100
Visit Apollo online, click here!

Hostgator

Pricing	Details
24 months plan (Prepaid)	$7.95/mo
Disk Space	600GB
Monthly Bandwidth	6,000GB
Free Domain Name	No
Host additional Domains	Unlimited
Parked Domains	Unlimited
Subdomains	Unlimited
mySQL Databases	100
Visit Hostgator online, click here!

Wrapping things up

You may not always need Hostgator, so testing Apollo may also not cause any harm. Try it and see if you’re fine with it, you can have it for longer period having costs’ advantage.

Comparison points between Hostgator and Dot5

Now check out Dot5 and Hostgator, see if you’ve come up with following points:

1. From packaging point of view, Hostgator is clearer while there’s a limited choice with Dot5Hosting.
2. If you’re looking for Windows hosting, Dot5Hosting may not be your choice.
3. Yes, Dot5Hosting provides services at quite low rates.
4. Both of them have enough number of hosted sites with them, exactly same in case of Lunarpages and Bluhost’s comparison.
5. And last, but not least, you’ll find user friendly hosting panels with both of them.

If you’ve come up with the above analysis or nearly same, you learnt almost whole of the art of comparing web hosting services. But since, learning has no end; there are many other things that need your attention. The next part of this article will explain another base to compare web hosting services.

This advanced tip is useful in case if you’re to host more than one site. ‘Reseller Account’ is the best choice in such a situation. But how to make a best choice for a reseller account is a question. Let’s see how we’ll do it. Let’s say, I’ve 10 sites. Now if I go for Hostgator, minimum it’ll cost me $4.95/month for one site and $49.5/ month for all 10 sites. Dot5Hosting can host 10 sites for me at $39.5/month [$3.95/month for one site].

My take between Dot5 and Hostgator

Dot5Hosting seems a better choice for me here, keeping in mind that I don’t need Windows hosting. But I’d be more than happy if I can have an offer with all the features of above packages at a bit low price. So, if I go for a Reseller package at Hostgator for $24.95/month and allocate required resources to all my sites myself I save $15/month means $180/year.

Think on these grounds and you’ll always find a better solution.

We’d a review of Hostgator services earlier and have identified it as a leading web hosting service with hundreds of thousands of satisfied customers.

The reason that Hostgator has such extended clientele is nothing other than the quality of services they provide. Decent packaging meeting all sorts of hosting requirements, efficient support, top quality servers and special offers on special occasions make Hostgator unique and trusted web hosting company.

The prices, in comparison with some low profile hosting companies may be a little high, but the quality services you get deserve that pricing. Though it’s one of the industry leaders, but you may not always need what Hostgator offers, and or you may find some other hosting services best according to your requirements, and all this depends on a careful comparison of different services and knowing your requirements well.

In the above context, let’s compare Webhostingpad and Hostgator in order to find which one suits best in which condition. Distinguishing feature of WebhostingPad.com is that it offers unlimited disk space and bandwidth along with hosting unlimited domains and unlimited databases, and all at relatively low prices, if you order for three years hosting at once. Other than this, they have robust and secure servers and 99% uptime, and a very efficient 24/7 support via phone as well as email.

Hostgator Hosting Features

Pricing	Details
12 months plan (Mid Plan)	$7.95/mo
Disk Space	600GB
Monthly Bandwidth	6,000GB
Free Domain Name	No
Host additional Domains	Unlimited
Parked Domains	Unlimited
Subdomains	Unlimited
POP and IMAP Email	Unlimited
Email Forwarders	Unlimited
Email Autoresponder	Unlimited
Visit Hostgator online now, click here!

WebHostingPad Hosting Features

Hosting Features	Details
Hosting Plan Pricing	$3.96/mo
Disk Space	Unlimited
Monthly Bandwidth	Unlimited
Free Domain Name	Yes
Free Site Builder	Yes
Host additional Domains	Unlimited
POP and IMAP Email	Unlimited
Email Forwarders	Unlimited
Email Autoresponder	Unlimited
Parked Domains	Unlimited
Subdomains	Unlimited
Visit WebHostingPad online now, click here!

WebHostingPad and Hostgator Comparisons

Since, both the hosts compared above are almost equally reliable and efficient, how can a user be indifferent among them? Here can be few areas to look at, so one can come up with best choice:

• Hostgator is though a bit expensive, but provides with monthly payments options so that if you’re not comfortable with the hosting, you can discontinue it. On the other hand, Webhostingpad.com offers a bit low pricing, but you must signup for at least six months.
• Setup fee at Webhostingpad is quite high as compared to Hostgator.
• Hostgator where provides different packages, limits the resources, while Webhostingpad offers unlimited resources, but since you know there’s nothing like unlimited bandwidth and disk space, so it’s better to have word with the support team as they provide 24/7 support before you buy a package.
• Another attraction for webmasters in Webhostingpad is their free professional consultancy that may not be available at Hostgator.

Having this comparison, hope you can find which one suit you better!

A comparison of Lunarpages and Bluehost has already been published to give the newbie webmasters a fair idea about the right choice of web hosting. In the same context this article will compare LunarPages with FatCow, so that a newbie webmaster can have clearer picture.

A quick intro on FatCow and Lunarpages

Summing up the points from previous article, Lunarpages.com provides users with a decent packaging that helps them to have a quick choice, user friendly hosting panel, value added services and a good service at a reasonable price.

On the other hand FatCow provides very cheap hosting services that include enough disk space and bandwidth with some of ready made scripts and limited MySQL databases. It sounds a good deal to go for FatCow since it’s offering unlimited domain hosting per account. Another distinguishing feature of FatCow.com is the tutorials it offers for best understanding and website management services.

Comparing FatCow and Lunarpages

Now on comparison, why Lunarpages.com may have more points, is just because of its clear packaging, i.e. you need to host a blog, go for package 1, want to host an enterprise site, go for the other and so on.

Exploring the inner side of FatCow, where it offers unlimited domains, the offer sounds too good if you have +10 sites, but a limited number of MYSQL databases, will definitely not let you have all those sites there within one account. So, it’s a mere waste of some resources, i.e. bandwidth and disk space.

FatCow can be a good choice, if you have two or three high traffic sites with five or less databases, but if you’re looking for dedicated servers and or windows hosting, LunarPages will definitely the best choice. FatCow may also not be a good choice if you’re having it for a single blog or a low traffic static site, you’ll be wasting resources then. So a fair better idea will be to outline your requirements and then see where you get most of it.

• Visit Lunarpages online: http://www.lunarpages.com
• Visit FatCow online: http://www.fatcow.com
• More readings on my web host comparison guides.

Both are very well known names in the web hosting circles with a huge clientele, i.e. Apollo hosts +165,000 domains and Hostmonster’s account is credited with +350,000 domains hosted with it. Since web hosting is a very competitive industry, any host with +100,000 hosted sites can be considered as one of the industry leaders.

Basic Hosting Features

Before we go any further in comparing the two, let’s have a look on Apollo and Hostmonster hosting features and package pricing.

Apollo Hosting

HostMonster

In a quick glance, you’ll notice that the price of Apollo Hosting is almost the same with Hostmonster; however the disk storage and bandwidth offer is what differs the most.

Apollo Hosting offer 50GB disk storage along with 500GB bandwidth transfer; while Hostmonster’s offering unlimited disk storage space and bandwidth transfer.

HostMonster is better than Apollo Hosting, here’s why.

Both are big names in the industry, but why do most of the people prefer or recommend Hostmonster? Does Hostmonster spend more on marketing, or it’s cheaper than Apollo? Or is there any other reason for Hostmonster to stand different?

The reasons are actually different, yet simple, and here’re some of them:

• Hostmonster provides with 24/7 support that is completely in house. The in house support means, your query is processed for the solution at an instance, with no delay.
• Hostmonster allows users to cancel their account anytime with no cancellation fees. There’s no long term contact sort of thing at all.
• It also provides free search engine submission for the hosted site.
• It excels in providing most secured ecommerce hosting, i.e. password protected directories and instant backup.
• And above all the server uptime makes it much desired.

Hostmonster is different, but that doesn’t mean Apollo isn’t. Apollo also comes with some distinguished features like, free and variety of paid website marketing and site move services. Apollo is an equally good choice for ecommerce sites, but if your site is looking for audio and video streaming with best multimedia functionalities, then there’s no comparison of Hostmonster.

Web hosting is a very competitive industry.

Since there’s a competition, the choice is also a bit difficult. In such situation, one best way to find a reliable and affordable host can be ‘comparison’ of different web hosting companies. How to do a good comparison is another issue, so here’s a sample:

Lunarpages.com and Bluehost.com are very prominent names in web hosting. One may get confused if he’s to choose a host among them, but if you’ve identified your needs and resources, the comparison presented below can help you out select the best one for you.

Compare BlueHost with Lunarpages

1. Packaging

Starting from features, the great difference between the two is packaging, i.e. Lunarpages provides with a neat packaging describing different packages, i.e. for blogs and small businesses and for enterprises etc while at Bluehost, this is a bit not clear.

Having a look at Lunarpages’ Packages, you can have a quick idea about the deal you want to have, while at Bluehost you’ll need to make an effort to explore that.

2. Windows Hosting

Along with packaging, the difference comes when Lunarpages offers Windows hosting as well. Though, not a big matter of concern for small businesses, but development environment may have a greater concern here.

So, if you’re looking for Windows hosting, Lunarpages will probably be your first choice.

3. Pricing

Since there lies difference in features, the pricing also differs. On comparing the both companies, Bluehost seems to be cost effective, but the value addition is a distinguished part of Lunarpages.

4. Customer Satisfaction

Being a major concern, if you have look at the user base of both companies, both have a good number of satisfied customers, i.e. a huge number of sites hosted with both.

5. User Friendly Hosting Panels

Though there’re differences, but some features like CPanel, Fantastico, Email Services, Sub domains etc are almost same on both.

Basic Hosting Features

Highlights on Lunarpages and Bluehost hosting plans. The hosting features for both web host are more or less the same except that Bluehost offers unlimited disk storage and bandwidth; while Lunarpages’s offering almost-unlimited disk storage (1,500GB) and bandwidth (15,000GB).

BlueHost hosting features

 Visit BlueHost online now, click here!

Lunarpages Hosting Features

 Visit LunarPages online, Click here!

In a nutshell, both the companies are having authority within their niche market. Your choice, however, depends on maximum satisfaction of your own needs. Lunarpages provides you with a variety where some deals may run out of your budget and most of them cost effective. On the other hand, Bluehost is much cost effective, but choice is limited here.